Why Measure? Part 2
This discussion of measurement in the non-profit world has been going on for some time now. In an article in the Summer 2004 issue of the Stanford Social Innovation Review, Katie Cunningham & Marc Ricks argue that major donors aren't really that interested in performance measurement. In fact, the note in the article that "only four of the 22 interviewees were strongly interested in getting better data on the performance of nonprofit organizations. Much to our surprise, the rest expressed skepticism – or even outright disapproval of the concept."
What's behind this counter-intuitive finding by SSIR? Well, they posit five reasons that major donors aren't clamoring for increased performance management:
- Donors Do Not See a Need for Performance Measurement
- Donors Do Not Have Time for Performance Measurement
- Donors Do Not Have Confidence in Performance Measurement
- Donors Do Not Want to See Nonprofit Resources Dedicated to Performance Measurement
- Donors Look to Institutional Funders to Engage in Performance Measurement on Their Behalf
A very interesting fact was that despite the fact that all the interviewees were successfull businessmen and women in their own right, when it came to charitable contributions, they almost all relied on "gut" and personal connections to make their decisions. The rigor and analysis they brough to their professional decisionmaking was left at the door when dealing with their personal charities.
But a bigger issue, in my mind, is a fundamental lack of understanding of the integrated nature of performance measurement and performance management. Our position has always been that "you can't manage something that you can't measure," so without measurement, there can certainly be no efficient management.
I think would go without saying that the funders of non-profits would like to see their favorite organizations managed better and to be more effective. Better measurement is not simply about creating a "report card" for the NFP, it's about helping them manage better.
Getting this message out to NFPs and mission driven organizations -- that the Balanced Scorecard is a management framework that can accelerate time to results -- is one of the mission objectives of Ascendant.
June 2021
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Monthly Archive
June 2014 (1)
May 2014 (2)
March 2014 (1)
February 2014 (2)
January 2014 (1)
December 2013 (1)
October 2013 (2)
September 2013 (1)
July 2013 (2)
June 2013 (2)
April 2013 (1)
March 2013 (3)
February 2013 (4)
January 2013 (7)
December 2012 (4)
November 2012 (8)
October 2012 (9)
September 2012 (5)
August 2012 (6)
July 2012 (5)
June 2012 (7)
May 2012 (8)
April 2012 (5)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (6)
January 2012 (6)
December 2011 (7)
November 2011 (9)
October 2011 (9)
September 2011 (2)
August 2011 (8)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (8)
May 2011 (12)
April 2011 (5)
March 2011 (1)
February 2011 (2)
January 2011 (4)
December 2010 (6)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (5)
September 2010 (4)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (2)
June 2010 (1)
May 2010 (2)
April 2010 (1)
March 2010 (3)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (1)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (2)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (6)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (3)
February 2009 (2)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (2)
November 2008 (2)
October 2008 (4)
September 2008 (6)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (6)
March 2008 (8)
This article was from back in December 2007: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119679811591913400...