The Eisenhower Principle applied to Nonprofit Management
I was skimming Newt Gingrich's new book, REAL CHANGE, and was reminded about General Eisenhower's amazing success in executing strategy. In World War II, Eisenhower coordinated the largest military undertaking ever, the invasion of Normandy. He not only managed huge sea, air, and land forces, but also managed unpredictable weather as well as the political forces of Roosevelt, Churchill and de Gaulle. When asked about his success, Eisenhower said "Whenever I run into a problem I can't solve, I always make it bigger.
I can never solve it by trying to make it smaller, but if I make it big enough, I can begin to see the outlines of a solution." Gingrich is speaking at the upcoming Council on Foundations meeting in Washington, and I think this "Principle" that he outlines applies directly to nonprofits and strategy management.
Organizations sometimes take an approach towards strategy management that is too detailed or too narrowly focused. Management By Objective (MBO) can give you a random set of objectives that do not link together in any coherent fashion. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) also can get an organization focused on something small, and not necessarily strategic. While both approaches have some great benefits, sometimes they come up short in holistically managing the strategy.
With the Balanced Scorecard, a Strategy Map allows an organization to see the entire strategy on one page. This one page view allows an organization to see how their objectives link together and how their measures align to the entire strategy. "Themes" or groups of objectives can really help an organization focus on its strategy. Themes can be created by looking for common areas across a set of strategic objectives, or they can be devised by using the Eisenhower Principle. In this approach, think about the areas where you are really struggling with your strategy, and take a step back. Are there some underlying causes or issues that need to be addressed? Is there a bigger problem that needs to be addressed? Can you take a step back and see the issue in a different way that allows you to take a different approach towards solving the crisis?
I think that many times, stepping back from the frenetic activity or crisis, will allow an organization to see a new approach, underlying theme, or broader set of issues that need to be addressed in order to better achieve the mission.
June 2021
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Monthly Archive
June 2014 (1)
May 2014 (2)
March 2014 (1)
February 2014 (2)
January 2014 (1)
December 2013 (1)
October 2013 (2)
September 2013 (1)
July 2013 (2)
June 2013 (2)
April 2013 (1)
March 2013 (3)
February 2013 (4)
January 2013 (7)
December 2012 (4)
November 2012 (8)
October 2012 (9)
September 2012 (5)
August 2012 (6)
July 2012 (5)
June 2012 (7)
May 2012 (8)
April 2012 (5)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (6)
January 2012 (6)
December 2011 (7)
November 2011 (9)
October 2011 (9)
September 2011 (2)
August 2011 (8)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (8)
May 2011 (12)
April 2011 (5)
March 2011 (1)
February 2011 (2)
January 2011 (4)
December 2010 (6)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (5)
September 2010 (4)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (2)
June 2010 (1)
May 2010 (2)
April 2010 (1)
March 2010 (3)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (1)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (2)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (6)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (3)
February 2009 (2)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (2)
November 2008 (2)
October 2008 (4)
September 2008 (6)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (6)
March 2008 (8)
The article was by Freakonomics authors Duber and Levitt about SmileTrain. Let me briefly summarize. Operation Smile sent doctors to poor parts of the world for cleft-repair surgery. One of the members of Operation Smile realized that they would never repair all cleft palates with this approach. The doctors always left without helping all the children. By stepping back and seeing the problem differently, SmileTrain was born.
SmileTrain took a different approach. They trained local doctors on doing the surgery affordably. This greatly sped the number of surguries and is allowing a host of other benefits, like employment and income for local doctors (at a fraction of the cost of sending in teams of doctors from developed countries).
Anyway, maybe this should be called the Eisenhower approach to strategy execution.
Ted Jackson