Fixing Charitable Giving
Pablo Eisenberg rightly points out the crisis facing charitable giving today in today's Wall Street Journal Report. He uses the better of a full page of print to outline his recommendations for how foundations and others can make a difference for nonprofits and their beneficiaries. While one can agree or disagree with the list – readers of this blog no doubt agree that to formalize strategy management, reporting and execution using a Balanced Scorecard would go a long way to addressing the challenges the author outlines.
The nine changes that Mr. Eisenberg proposes include: 1)Increase distribution percentage, 2)Increase general and operating support, 3)Increase multiyear funding, 4)Adopt rolling grant making, 5)Allocate more funds to the truly needy, 6)Reach out to local groups and underserved regions, 7)Simplify application and reporting procedures, 8)Improve public accountability, and 9)Fund the watchdogs.
While the author's specific views might spark an interesting debate – I agree strongly that visibility, accountability and predictability will enhance performance of nonprofits across the board. We should work together as a critical sector of our economy to make more of this a requirement. Whether we use a Balanced Scorecard or some other form of logic model – formalizing strategy and communicating strategy performance will allow philanthropists to see the strategic impact their funds can have.
Watchdogs, foundations and nonprofits themselves to date have fueled some of the challenges Mr. Eisenberg points out. Watchdogs have created the bias toward program based funding rather than unrestricted or general operating support. Nonprofits are forced to "disclose" the percent of resources that go to operations. It is as if having an organization that can achieve scale, attract talent and drive impact is a problem. Foundations have created other problems as their own book keeping requirements have created such bureaucratic procedures that "the grant you cannot afford to win" has become common place. And finally, nonprofits themselves have not held themselves to the level of accountability and transparency befitting a charitable organization. They should be forthcoming with their strategy, perhaps depicted in a strategy map. They should report results perhaps through a balanced scorecard. They should celebrate the learning that comes from true strategy management. Only then will philanthropists be willing to "invest" as partners in the long term strategy of our mission driven organizations.
To see Pablo Eisenber's articl see wsj.com/reports
June 2021
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Monthly Archive
June 2014 (1)
May 2014 (2)
March 2014 (1)
February 2014 (2)
January 2014 (1)
December 2013 (1)
October 2013 (2)
September 2013 (1)
July 2013 (2)
June 2013 (2)
April 2013 (1)
March 2013 (3)
February 2013 (4)
January 2013 (7)
December 2012 (4)
November 2012 (8)
October 2012 (9)
September 2012 (5)
August 2012 (6)
July 2012 (5)
June 2012 (7)
May 2012 (8)
April 2012 (5)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (6)
January 2012 (6)
December 2011 (7)
November 2011 (9)
October 2011 (9)
September 2011 (2)
August 2011 (8)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (8)
May 2011 (12)
April 2011 (5)
March 2011 (1)
February 2011 (2)
January 2011 (4)
December 2010 (6)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (5)
September 2010 (4)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (2)
June 2010 (1)
May 2010 (2)
April 2010 (1)
March 2010 (3)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (1)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (2)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (6)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (3)
February 2009 (2)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (2)
November 2008 (2)
October 2008 (4)
September 2008 (6)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (6)
March 2008 (8)