On Motivating Knowledge Workers in the Federal Government
I think I am like most people in that I use some of my holiday season downtime to catch up on leisure reading I haven't had the opportunity to get to over the previous months. So, when I found myself flipping through my latest issue of the Defense Acquisition Research Journal (DARJ), I was pleasantly surprised to see an article titled "Motivating the Knowledge Worker," by the Defense Intelligence Agency's (DIA) Dr. David E. Frick.
The title immediately drew me to the article because it is the same topic Dan Pink will be discussing at Ascendant's Mission-Driven Management Summit (MDMS), March 6-8, at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.
If you have read Pink's book DRIVE: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us, you'll know that he has spends the majority of the book sifting through years of literature on motivation to demonstrate that what managers are taught to do to motivate employees is actually incorrect – extrinsic motivators, particularly money, are not effective.
In his article, available on the web from DARJ, Frick discusses his research which leads him to a similar conclusion with respect to the "knowledge workers" in the Defense acquisition community. He begins by pointing out the special case of public sector workers (which applies to social sector / nonprofit workers as well) that their motivation at work differs from private sector workers because they desire to serve the public, among other things.
I found one aspect of Frick's study of 132 federal workers most revealing: Their list of positive and negative factors that influence their work. He lists 18 top positive factors and 14 top negative factors, but I will share just the top five for each.
The top five positive factors were: (1) meaningful work; (2) belief in mission; (3) public service; (4) opportunity to advance; and (5) relationship with coworkers. "Total compensation" was number 16 on the list. The top five negative factors were: (1) insufficient resources; (2) bad managers; (3) lack of management support; (4) unwillingness to deal with substandard performers; and (5) difficult commute.
I think Dan Pink's reaction to these two lists would be, "Duh! Of course!" The top five positive factors are all intrinsic and personal to the individual while the top five negative factors all deal with extrinsic factors. That's why efforts to motivate people at work merely through compensation don't work. Until managers come to terms with this, they will continue to have problems motivating their workers.
June 2021
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Monthly Archive
June 2014 (1)
May 2014 (2)
March 2014 (1)
February 2014 (2)
January 2014 (1)
December 2013 (1)
October 2013 (2)
September 2013 (1)
July 2013 (2)
June 2013 (2)
April 2013 (1)
March 2013 (3)
February 2013 (4)
January 2013 (7)
December 2012 (4)
November 2012 (8)
October 2012 (9)
September 2012 (5)
August 2012 (6)
July 2012 (5)
June 2012 (7)
May 2012 (8)
April 2012 (5)
March 2012 (5)
February 2012 (6)
January 2012 (6)
December 2011 (7)
November 2011 (9)
October 2011 (9)
September 2011 (2)
August 2011 (8)
July 2011 (6)
June 2011 (8)
May 2011 (12)
April 2011 (5)
March 2011 (1)
February 2011 (2)
January 2011 (4)
December 2010 (6)
November 2010 (3)
October 2010 (5)
September 2010 (4)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (2)
June 2010 (1)
May 2010 (2)
April 2010 (1)
March 2010 (3)
January 2010 (4)
December 2009 (1)
November 2009 (1)
October 2009 (1)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (2)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (3)
May 2009 (6)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (3)
February 2009 (2)
January 2009 (2)
December 2008 (2)
November 2008 (2)
October 2008 (4)
September 2008 (6)
August 2008 (5)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (9)
May 2008 (5)
April 2008 (6)
March 2008 (8)